Culver City, California · CMS Care Compare

Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF

2 of 5 · CMS overall rating Below average

3828 DELMAS TERRACE, Culver City, CA 90232

For profit - Limited Liability company 21 certified beds All California homes →

Culver City, California · CMS verdict

Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF holds a 2 of 5 CMS overall star rating - below the California state average of 3.1, reflecting below-average quality on the federal five-star scale.

2/5 CMS overall
2/5 Health inspection
1/5 Staffing
21 Certified beds

The rating and the PlainElderCare Index below summarize federal inspection, staffing, and outcome data, they measure specific, documented dimensions of this facility, not a holistic verdict on the care your family member would receive. Visit in person, talk with staff and current residents' families, and weigh your family member's specific needs before choosing.

Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF in Culver City, California holds a CMS overall rating of 2 of 5 stars and a PlainElderCare Quality & Compliance Index of 39 of 100 (grade F). The 21-bed facility operates where a semi-private nursing-home room in California runs a median of $12,167 per month. Figures are from CMS Nursing Home Compare.

39 of 100 · F

PlainElderCare Quality & Compliance Index

A transparent composite of this facility's CMS Care Compare sub-ratings and its federal inspection record. It complements, and does not replace, the official CMS overall rating of 2 of 5 stars. How this is calculated.

How the 39 is built

Each segment is a dimension's weighted points toward the score, summing to 39.

Health inspections 2/5 stars · 25
Staffing 1/5 stars · 0
Quality measures 5/5 stars · 100
Inspection record 34 deficiencies · 31.666666666666668

Weights: health inspections 30%, staffing 25%, quality measures 25%, inspection record 20%; any dimension CMS has not published drops out and its weight redistributes (no silent deflation). Inspection record is benchmarked against all rated US nursing homes. Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.

Data insights

Quality ratings

On Care Compare (data as of April 2026), Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF carries an overall CMS quality rating of 2 out of 5 stars. That figure rolls up three sub-ratings tracked separately: health inspection (2/5), staffing (1/5), and quality measures (5/5).

What each sub-rating measures

The health inspection rating reflects on-site surveyor findings from the last three cycles. The staffing rating compares case-mix-adjusted nurse hours per resident day to national benchmarks, and quality measures aggregate 15 clinical indicators including pressure ulcers, falls with injury, and long-stay antipsychotic use.

Size and setting

Located in Culver City, California, this facility operates 21 certified beds with an average daily census of roughly 16 residents - an occupancy rate of about 76%. The facility is classified under for profit - limited liability company ownership, a designation that can influence staffing patterns, reinvestment decisions, and admissions policy. At roughly 76% occupancy, this facility has meaningful open capacity relative to its certified bed count.

Same-ownership peers

Within California, Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF is one of 606 for profit - limited liability company nursing homes CMS rates. Its 2-star overall rating sits below the for profit - limited liability company-segment average of 2.9 stars, ahead of roughly 19% of same-ownership peers in the state. Peer comparisons within the same ownership type are more apples-to-apples than a state-wide average, since for-profit, non-profit, and government operators tend to differ systematically in staffing and reinvestment.

Inspection record

On the regulatory side, federal and state surveyors have documented multiple deficiencies at this facility (34 total). CMS has levied no enforcement penalties over the equivalent window. This is a high deficiency count relative to most facilities; requesting the full survey report directly is the only way to see whether these are concentrated in one area or spread across the facility's operations.

Where these figures come from

The figures above come directly from the U.S. Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services Nursing Home Compare dataset for federal quality ratings, combined with the CareScout 2025 Cost of Care Survey of more than 15,000 elder-care providers nationwide and U.S. Census American Community Survey income data. Cost figures are monthly medians, refreshed annually with each new CareScout release; quality ratings are refreshed quarterly from the CMS Provider Information File. Read these state and county medians as benchmarks, then verify current rates with individual providers and consult care managers before making placement decisions. See our methodology for source vintage.

How Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF compares to California

CMS five-star sub-ratings (0–5) for this facility against the California facility-weighted average. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Overall 2/5 · state avg 3.1
Health inspection 2/5 · state avg 2.8
Staffing 1/5 · state avg 3.1
Quality measures 5/5 · state avg 4.1

Bar = this facility's rating · vertical marker = California state average. Higher is better on all four CMS measures.

Where Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF ranks in California

Among the 1,154 CMS-rated nursing homes in California, Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF’s 2-star overall rating is higher than 16% of them. The bars show how all California homes spread across the CMS 1-to-5 scale; this facility’s band is highlighted.

1 star 184 · 16%
2 stars · this facility 238 · 21%
3 stars 231 · 20%
4 stars 222 · 19%
5 stars 279 · 24%

238 California homes share this 2-star rating. Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.

Facility details

Beds, residents, ownership, location, penalty and deficiency counts from CMS Care Compare.
Attribute Value
Beds 21
Residents 16
Ownership For profit - Limited Liability company
County Los Angeles
Penalties 0
Deficiencies 34

Source: CMS Care Compare Nursing Homes (data as of April 2026)

What do families ask most?

What is the quality rating for Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF?

2 out of 5 stars is Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF's current CMS overall rating, built from a health inspection rating of 2/5, a staffing rating of 1/5, and a quality measures rating of 5/5.

How much does a nursing home cost per month in California?

CareScout's 2025 survey puts California's median semi-private nursing home rate at $12,167 per month ($146,000 per year), with private rooms averaging $15,178 per month.

What services does Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF offer?

With 21 beds with approximately 16 current residents, Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF is a skilled nursing facility. It operates under for profit - limited liability company ownership, and CMS's inspection record shows 34 deficiencies and 0 penalties.

Does Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF have any deficiencies or penalties?

Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF has multiple deficiencies (34 total) and 0 penalties recorded by CMS. A count this high is above what most facilities post; ask the facility directly for its plan of correction on the largest findings.

What are the alternatives to a nursing home in California?

In California, alternatives include assisted living ($7,000/mo), home health aides ($7,627/mo), and adult day care ($2,037/mo).

Elder Care Guides

Explore PlainElderCare

Related Resources

Compare cost and CMS quality across the state on the California elder-care overview, or see how facilities rank nationwide in our highest-rated states ranking.

Weigh nursing care against assisted living, home health, and adult day care, with national median costs, on our care types comparison, and learn how to fund it in our paying for elder care guide.

Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare. Provider ID: 555874.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainElderCare Editorial