Sacramento, California · CMS Care Compare

Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

3 of 5 · CMS overall rating Average

2257 FAIR OAKS BLVD., Sacramento, CA 95825

For profit - Limited Liability company 139 certified beds All California homes →

Sacramento, California · CMS verdict

Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center holds a 3 of 5 CMS overall star rating - in line with the California state average of 3.1, reflecting average quality on the federal five-star scale.

3/5 CMS overall
2/5 Health inspection
4/5 Staffing
139 Certified beds

The rating and the PlainElderCare Index below summarize federal inspection, staffing, and outcome data, they measure specific, documented dimensions of this facility, not a holistic verdict on the care your family member would receive. Visit in person, talk with staff and current residents' families, and weigh your family member's specific needs before choosing.

Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in Sacramento, California holds a CMS overall rating of 3 of 5 stars and a PlainElderCare Quality & Compliance Index of 54 of 100 (grade F). The 139-bed facility operates where a semi-private nursing-home room in California runs a median of $12,167 per month. Figures are from CMS Nursing Home Compare.

54 of 100 · F

PlainElderCare Quality & Compliance Index

A transparent composite of this facility's CMS Care Compare sub-ratings and its federal inspection record. It complements, and does not replace, the official CMS overall rating of 3 of 5 stars. How this is calculated.

How the 54 is built

Each segment is a dimension's weighted points toward the score, summing to 54.

Health inspections 2/5 stars · 25
Staffing 4/5 stars · 75
Quality measures 5/5 stars · 100
Inspection record 52 deficiencies · 13.333333333333334

Weights: health inspections 30%, staffing 25%, quality measures 25%, inspection record 20%; any dimension CMS has not published drops out and its weight redistributes (no silent deflation). Inspection record is benchmarked against all rated US nursing homes. Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.

Data insights

Quality ratings

CMS's most recent Care Compare release (data as of April 2026) puts Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's overall quality rating at 3 out of 5 stars, a composite of three sub-ratings: health inspection (2/5), staffing (4/5), and quality measures (5/5).

What each sub-rating measures

The health inspection rating reflects on-site surveyor findings from the last three cycles. The staffing rating compares case-mix-adjusted nurse hours per resident day to national benchmarks, and quality measures aggregate 15 clinical indicators including pressure ulcers, falls with injury, and long-stay antipsychotic use.

Size and setting

Located in Sacramento, California, this facility operates 139 certified beds with an average daily census of roughly 133 residents - an occupancy rate of about 96%. The facility is classified under for profit - limited liability company ownership, a designation that can influence staffing patterns, reinvestment decisions, and admissions policy. At roughly 96% occupancy, this facility is running near full capacity, worth confirming current bed availability directly before visiting.

Same-ownership peers

Within California, Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center is one of 606 for profit - limited liability company nursing homes CMS rates. Its 3-star overall rating sits above the for profit - limited liability company-segment average of 2.9 stars, ahead of roughly 44% of same-ownership peers in the state. Comparing a facility against its own ownership segment holds the business model roughly constant, which helps isolate facility-level performance from the staffing and reinvestment patterns that differ across for-profit, non-profit, and government operators.

Inspection record

On the regulatory side, federal and state surveyors have documented multiple deficiencies at this facility (52 total). CMS has levied no enforcement penalties over the equivalent window. This is a high deficiency count relative to most facilities; requesting the full survey report directly is the only way to see whether these are concentrated in one area or spread across the facility's operations.

Where these figures come from

The figures above come directly from the U.S. Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services Nursing Home Compare dataset for federal quality ratings, combined with the CareScout 2025 Cost of Care Survey of more than 15,000 elder-care providers nationwide and U.S. Census American Community Survey income data. Cost figures are monthly medians, refreshed annually with each new CareScout release; quality ratings are refreshed quarterly from the CMS Provider Information File. Read these state and county medians as benchmarks, then verify current rates with individual providers and consult care managers before making placement decisions. See our methodology for source vintage.

How Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center compares to California

CMS five-star sub-ratings (0–5) for this facility against the California facility-weighted average. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Overall 3/5 · state avg 3.1
Health inspection 2/5 · state avg 2.8
Staffing 4/5 · state avg 3.1
Quality measures 5/5 · state avg 4.1

Bar = this facility's rating · vertical marker = California state average. Higher is better on all four CMS measures.

Where Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center ranks in California

Among the 1,154 CMS-rated nursing homes in California, Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center’s 3-star overall rating is higher than 37% of them. The bars show how all California homes spread across the CMS 1-to-5 scale; this facility’s band is highlighted.

1 star 184 · 16%
2 stars 238 · 21%
3 stars · this facility 231 · 20%
4 stars 222 · 19%
5 stars 279 · 24%

231 California homes share this 3-star rating. Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.

Facility details

Beds, residents, ownership, location, penalty and deficiency counts from CMS Care Compare.
Attribute Value
Beds 139
Residents 133
Ownership For profit - Limited Liability company
County Sacramento
Penalties 0
Deficiencies 52

Source: CMS Care Compare Nursing Homes (data as of April 2026)

What do families ask most?

What is the quality rating for Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center?

CMS rates Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center at 3 out of 5 stars overall. The three sub-ratings behind that number: health inspection 2/5, staffing 4/5, quality measures 5/5.

How much does a nursing home cost per month in California?

CareScout's 2025 survey puts California's median semi-private nursing home rate at $12,167 per month ($146,000 per year), with private rooms averaging $15,178 per month.

What services does Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center offer?

Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center operates as a skilled nursing facility (139 beds with approximately 133 current residents) under for profit - limited liability company ownership. CMS inspections have recorded 52 deficiencies and 0 penalties there.

Does Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center have any deficiencies or penalties?

Asbury Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has multiple deficiencies (52 total) and 0 penalties recorded by CMS. A count this high is above what most facilities post; ask the facility directly for its plan of correction on the largest findings.

What are the alternatives to a nursing home in California?

In California, alternatives include assisted living ($7,000/mo), home health aides ($7,627/mo), and adult day care ($2,037/mo).

Elder Care Guides

Explore PlainElderCare

Related Resources

Compare cost and CMS quality across the state on the California elder-care overview, or see how facilities rank nationwide in our highest-rated states ranking.

Weigh nursing care against assisted living, home health, and adult day care, with national median costs, on our care types comparison, and learn how to fund it in our paying for elder care guide.

Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare. Provider ID: 555673.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainElderCare Editorial