Darby, Pennsylvania · CMS Care Compare

St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare

4 of 5 · CMS overall rating Above average

1412 LANSDOWNE AVENUE, Darby, PA 19023

For profit - Limited Liability company 273 certified beds All Pennsylvania homes →

Darby, Pennsylvania · CMS verdict

On the federal five-star scale, St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare carries a 4 of 5 CMS overall rating, above-average quality that runs above Pennsylvania's state average of 3.0.

4/5 CMS overall
4/5 Health inspection
2/5 Staffing
273 Certified beds

The rating and the PlainElderCare Index below summarize federal inspection, staffing, and outcome data, they measure specific, documented dimensions of this facility, not a holistic verdict on the care your family member would receive. Visit in person, talk with staff and current residents' families, and weigh your family member's specific needs before choosing.

St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare in Darby, Pennsylvania holds a CMS overall rating of 4 of 5 stars and a PlainElderCare Quality & Compliance Index of 51 of 100 (grade F). The 273-bed facility operates where a semi-private nursing-home room in Pennsylvania runs a median of $11,954 per month. Figures are from CMS Nursing Home Compare.

51 of 100 · F

PlainElderCare Quality & Compliance Index

A transparent composite of this facility's CMS Care Compare sub-ratings and its federal inspection record. It complements, and does not replace, the official CMS overall rating of 4 of 5 stars. How this is calculated.

How the 51 is built

Each segment is a dimension's weighted points toward the score, summing to 51.

Health inspections 4/5 stars · 75
Staffing 2/5 stars · 25
Quality measures N/A · not scored
Inspection record 25 deficiencies · 46.666666666666664

Weights: health inspections 30%, staffing 25%, quality measures 25%, inspection record 20%; any dimension CMS has not published drops out and its weight redistributes (no silent deflation). Inspection record is benchmarked against all rated US nursing homes. Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.

Data insights

Quality ratings

CMS's most recent Care Compare release (data as of April 2026) puts St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare's overall quality rating at 4 out of 5 stars, a composite of three sub-ratings: health inspection (4/5), staffing (2/5), and quality measures (N/A).

What each sub-rating measures

The health inspection rating reflects on-site surveyor findings from the last three cycles. The staffing rating compares case-mix-adjusted nurse hours per resident day to national benchmarks, and quality measures aggregate 15 clinical indicators including pressure ulcers, falls with injury, and long-stay antipsychotic use.

Size and setting

Located in Darby, Pennsylvania, this facility operates 273 certified beds with an average daily census of roughly 228 residents - an occupancy rate of about 84%. The facility is classified under for profit - limited liability company ownership, a designation that can influence staffing patterns, reinvestment decisions, and admissions policy. At about 84% occupancy, this facility's bed usage looks steady and consistent with a stabilized operation.

Same-ownership peers

Within Pennsylvania, St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare is one of 146 for profit - limited liability company nursing homes CMS rates. Its 4-star overall rating sits above the for profit - limited liability company-segment average of 2.3 stars, ahead of roughly 84% of same-ownership peers in the state. This ownership-segment comparison controls for business-model differences, so what's left mostly reflects how this facility runs relative to similar operators, not the type of operator it is.

Inspection record

On the regulatory side, federal and state surveyors have documented multiple deficiencies at this facility (25 total). CMS has levied no enforcement penalties over the equivalent window. This is a high deficiency count relative to most facilities; requesting the full survey report directly is the only way to see whether these are concentrated in one area or spread across the facility's operations.

Where these figures come from

The figures above come directly from the U.S. Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services Nursing Home Compare dataset for federal quality ratings, combined with the CareScout 2025 Cost of Care Survey of more than 15,000 elder-care providers nationwide and U.S. Census American Community Survey income data. Cost figures are monthly medians, refreshed annually with each new CareScout release; quality ratings are refreshed quarterly from the CMS Provider Information File. Read these state and county medians as benchmarks, then verify current rates with individual providers and consult care managers before making placement decisions. See our methodology for source vintage.

How St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare compares to Pennsylvania

CMS five-star sub-ratings (0–5) for this facility against the Pennsylvania facility-weighted average. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Overall 4/5 · state avg 3.0
Health inspection 4/5 · state avg 2.8
Staffing 2/5 · state avg 3.3

Bar = this facility's rating · vertical marker = Pennsylvania state average. Higher is better on all four CMS measures.

Where St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare ranks in Pennsylvania

Among the 653 CMS-rated nursing homes in Pennsylvania, St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare’s 4-star overall rating is higher than 62% of them. The bars show how all Pennsylvania homes spread across the CMS 1-to-5 scale; this facility’s band is highlighted.

1 star 129 · 20%
2 stars 144 · 22%
3 stars 130 · 20%
4 stars · this facility 101 · 15%
5 stars 149 · 23%

101 Pennsylvania homes share this 4-star rating. Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.

Facility details

Beds, residents, ownership, location, penalty and deficiency counts from CMS Care Compare.
Attribute Value
Beds 273
Residents 228
Ownership For profit - Limited Liability company
County Delaware
Penalties 0
Deficiencies 25

Source: CMS Care Compare Nursing Homes (data as of April 2026)

What do families ask most?

What is the quality rating for St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare?

4 out of 5 stars is St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare's current CMS overall rating, built from a health inspection rating of 4/5, a staffing rating of 2/5, and a quality measures rating of N/A.

How much does a nursing home cost per month in Pennsylvania?

In Pennsylvania, a semi-private nursing home room runs a median $11,954/month ($143,445/year) per the CareScout 2025 survey; private rooms average $13,688/month.

What services does St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare offer?

With 273 beds with approximately 228 current residents, St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare is a skilled nursing facility. It operates under for profit - limited liability company ownership, and CMS's inspection record shows 25 deficiencies and 0 penalties.

Does St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare have any deficiencies or penalties?

St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare has multiple deficiencies (25 total) and 0 penalties recorded by CMS. A count this high is above what most facilities post; ask the facility directly for its plan of correction on the largest findings.

What are the alternatives to a nursing home in Pennsylvania?

In Pennsylvania, alternatives include assisted living ($6,480/mo), home health aides ($6,483/mo), and adult day care ($2,535/mo).

Elder Care Guides

Explore PlainElderCare

Related Resources

Compare cost and CMS quality across the state on the Pennsylvania elder-care overview, or see how facilities rank nationwide in our highest-rated states ranking.

Weigh nursing care against assisted living, home health, and adult day care, with national median costs, on our care types comparison, and learn how to fund it in our paying for elder care guide.

Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare. Provider ID: 395282.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainElderCare Editorial