Bakersfield, California · CMS Care Compare

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield

1 of 5 · CMS overall rating Much below average

2211 MOUNT VERNON AVENUE, Bakersfield, CA 93306

For profit - Limited Liability company 160 certified beds All California homes →

Bakersfield, California · CMS verdict

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield holds a 1 of 5 CMS overall star rating - below the California state average of 3.1, reflecting below-average quality on the federal five-star scale.

1/5 CMS overall
1/5 Health inspection
2/5 Staffing
160 Certified beds

The rating and the PlainElderCare Index below summarize federal inspection, staffing, and outcome data, they measure specific, documented dimensions of this facility, not a holistic verdict on the care your family member would receive. Visit in person, talk with staff and current residents' families, and weigh your family member's specific needs before choosing.

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield in Bakersfield, California holds a CMS overall rating of 1 of 5 stars and a PlainElderCare Quality & Compliance Index of 21 of 100 (grade F). The 160-bed facility operates where a semi-private nursing-home room in California runs a median of $12,167 per month. Figures are from CMS Nursing Home Compare.

21 of 100 · F

PlainElderCare Quality & Compliance Index

A transparent composite of this facility's CMS Care Compare sub-ratings and its federal inspection record. It complements, and does not replace, the official CMS overall rating of 1 of 5 stars. How this is calculated.

How the 21 is built

Each segment is a dimension's weighted points toward the score, summing to 21.

Health inspections 1/5 stars · 0
Staffing 2/5 stars · 25
Quality measures 3/5 stars · 50
Inspection record 106 deficiencies · 10

Weights: health inspections 30%, staffing 25%, quality measures 25%, inspection record 20%; any dimension CMS has not published drops out and its weight redistributes (no silent deflation). Inspection record is benchmarked against all rated US nursing homes. Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.

Data insights

Quality ratings

CMS's most recent Care Compare release (data as of April 2026) puts The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield's overall quality rating at 1 out of 5 stars, a composite of three sub-ratings: health inspection (1/5), staffing (2/5), and quality measures (3/5).

What each sub-rating measures

The health inspection rating reflects on-site surveyor findings from the last three cycles. The staffing rating compares case-mix-adjusted nurse hours per resident day to national benchmarks, and quality measures aggregate 15 clinical indicators including pressure ulcers, falls with injury, and long-stay antipsychotic use.

Size and setting

Located in Bakersfield, California, this facility operates 160 certified beds with an average daily census of roughly 136 residents - an occupancy rate of about 85%. The facility is classified under for profit - limited liability company ownership, a designation that can influence staffing patterns, reinvestment decisions, and admissions policy. At roughly 85% occupancy, this facility runs close to its typical range for a stabilized operation.

Same-ownership peers

Within California, The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield is one of 606 for profit - limited liability company nursing homes CMS rates. Its 1-star overall rating sits below the for profit - limited liability company-segment average of 2.9 stars, ahead of roughly 0% of same-ownership peers in the state. Comparing a facility against its own ownership segment holds the business model roughly constant, which helps isolate facility-level performance from the staffing and reinvestment patterns that differ across for-profit, non-profit, and government operators.

Inspection record

On the regulatory side, federal and state surveyors have documented multiple deficiencies at this facility (106 total). CMS has levied 2 enforcement penalties - civil money penalties or denials of payment, during the same window. This is a high deficiency count relative to most facilities; requesting the full survey report directly is the only way to see whether these are concentrated in one area or spread across the facility's operations.

Where these figures come from

The figures above come directly from the U.S. Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services Nursing Home Compare dataset for federal quality ratings, combined with the CareScout 2025 Cost of Care Survey of more than 15,000 elder-care providers nationwide and U.S. Census American Community Survey income data. Cost figures are monthly medians, refreshed annually with each new CareScout release; quality ratings are refreshed quarterly from the CMS Provider Information File. Read these state and county medians as benchmarks, then verify current rates with individual providers and consult care managers before making placement decisions. See our methodology for source vintage.

How The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield compares to California

CMS five-star sub-ratings (0–5) for this facility against the California facility-weighted average. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Overall 1/5 · state avg 3.1
Health inspection 1/5 · state avg 2.8
Staffing 2/5 · state avg 3.1
Quality measures 3/5 · state avg 4.1

Bar = this facility's rating · vertical marker = California state average. Higher is better on all four CMS measures.

Where The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield ranks in California

Among the 1,154 CMS-rated nursing homes in California, The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield’s 1-star overall rating is higher than 0% of them. The bars show how all California homes spread across the CMS 1-to-5 scale; this facility’s band is highlighted.

1 star · this facility 184 · 16%
2 stars 238 · 21%
3 stars 231 · 20%
4 stars 222 · 19%
5 stars 279 · 24%

184 California homes share this 1-star rating. Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.

Facility details

Beds, residents, ownership, location, penalty and deficiency counts from CMS Care Compare.
Attribute Value
Beds 160
Residents 136
Ownership For profit - Limited Liability company
County Kern
Penalties 2
Deficiencies 106

Source: CMS Care Compare Nursing Homes (data as of April 2026)

What do families ask most?

What is the quality rating for The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield?

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield has an overall CMS quality rating of 1 out of 5 stars, with a health inspection rating of 1/5, staffing rating of 2/5, and quality measures rating of 3/5.

How much does a nursing home cost per month in California?

CareScout's 2025 survey puts California's median semi-private nursing home rate at $12,167 per month ($146,000 per year), with private rooms averaging $15,178 per month.

What services does The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield offer?

With 160 beds with approximately 136 current residents, The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield is a skilled nursing facility. It operates under for profit - limited liability company ownership, and CMS's inspection record shows 106 deficiencies and 2 penalties.

Does The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield have any deficiencies or penalties?

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield has multiple deficiencies (106 total) and 2 penalties recorded by CMS. A count this high is above what most facilities post; ask the facility directly for its plan of correction on the largest findings.

What are the alternatives to a nursing home in California?

In California, alternatives include assisted living ($7,000/mo), home health aides ($7,627/mo), and adult day care ($2,037/mo).

Elder Care Guides

Explore PlainElderCare

Related Resources

Compare cost and CMS quality across the state on the California elder-care overview, or see how facilities rank nationwide in our highest-rated states ranking.

Weigh nursing care against assisted living, home health, and adult day care, with national median costs, on our care types comparison, and learn how to fund it in our paying for elder care guide.

Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare. Provider ID: 555256.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainElderCare Editorial