States with the Most Nursing Homes
All states ranked by total number of nursing home facilities, where the most options are available.
A state average is a starting filter, not a personal recommendation, every state contains both strong and weak individual facilities. Evaluate specific providers and consult a care professional about your family member's needs before deciding.
50-state ranking · Facilities
Texas ranks #1 for facilities at 1,177 - the 50-state range runs 17 to 1,177, a 69.2× spread.
According to the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, its Nursing Home Compare program publishes quality and capacity data for 14,710 Medicare-certified nursing homes across all 51 states, last compiled in June 2026; see our methodology for source vintage and how each ranking is computed.
What This Ranking Tells Us
The number of nursing homes in a state reflects both population size and the age demographics of the region. States with large elderly populations and high population density tend to have the most facilities. More facilities generally means more choices for families, but it does not guarantee better quality or lower costs. States with fewer facilities per capita may face supply constraints that drive up costs and reduce options.
How the 51 states are distributed
Count of states in each facilities band, most states cluster in the middle, with the tails driving the ranking’s extremes.
How to read this ranking
What the rankings reflect
State-level rankings synthesize underlying market dynamics into a single comparable metric, but every position on this list reflects a chain of causes that families should weigh against their own circumstances. Cost rankings, for instance, are driven primarily by local wage levels for certified nursing assistants, registered nurses, and licensed practical nurses, who together account for the majority of operating expenses in a typical nursing home or assisted living facility. Real estate values, certificate-of-need regulations that constrain new construction, and state Medicaid reimbursement rates also shape the price floor in each market. A state at the top of a cost ranking is rarely uniformly expensive, metropolitan areas typically command 20% to 40% premiums over rural counties within the same state.
How quality ratings work
Quality rankings carry their own subtleties. The CMS Five-Star rating system combines three weighted components: health inspection findings (weighted most heavily because they reflect on-site evaluation by trained surveyors), payroll-based staffing data submitted quarterly through the PBJ system, and quality measure outcomes drawn from standardized resident assessments. A state with high average ratings may still have specific facilities that warrant scrutiny, and a state with mid-tier averages can contain individual 5-star facilities. Use the state-average rankings as a starting filter, then drill into county and facility detail pages to compare specific providers near you.
Why provider density matters
Provider availability, measured by the count of CMS-certified nursing homes and Medicare-certified home health agencies, is a third lens worth considering. Higher provider density typically means more choice, shorter waiting lists, and faster Medicare or Medicaid claims processing because state survey agencies maintain larger inspection rosters. Lower density can mean longer drives for family visits, less competitive pricing, and limited specialty options like memory care, ventilator-dependent units, or short-term rehab. Per-capita figures (facilities per 1,000 residents aged 65+) help normalize for state population size and surface markets where supply has not kept pace with the aging population.
Methodology and sources
Methodology note: cost figures reflect the CareScout 2025 Cost of Care Survey, a long-running annual survey conducted with licensed providers across the United States. Median monthly figures are reported for each of five care settings; we present semi-private nursing-home rooms as the most commonly compared benchmark. Quality ratings come from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Five-Star rating system as published on the Care Compare site, refreshed monthly. Cross-state comparisons should account for differences in cost of living, regional wage indices, and the Medicaid waiver programs that affect what a family will actually pay out of pocket after coverage.
Regional patterns
Regional context shapes how to read this ranking. The Northeast and West Coast typically anchor the high-cost tier, reflecting denser populated metros, higher prevailing wages, and stricter staffing rules in states like California, New York, Massachusetts, and Connecticut that lift the floor on facility operating costs. The South and rural Mountain West tend to anchor the lower-cost tier, with lower wage indices and more dispersed populations producing lower median rents and lower staffing premiums. Within any region, individual states diverge significantly based on Medicaid generosity, certificate-of-need policy, and the share of the local population aged 65 and older, Florida, Arizona, and Maine each face above-average elder-care demand for very different demographic reasons.
Cost trajectories over time
Cost trajectories matter alongside the level. National median nursing-home costs have risen roughly 4-6% per year since 2019, outpacing general inflation and putting pressure on long-term-care insurance reserves, family caregiver budgets, and Medicaid state budgets that fund the largest share of nursing-home care nationally. States that face the steepest cost growth often share three traits: above-average aging populations creating demand pressure, tight nursing labor markets limiting facility hiring, and certificate-of-need regulations that constrain new supply. Tracking year-over-year change alongside the current level gives a fuller picture of where a state is heading rather than just where it sits today.
Practical filters for families
For families using this ranking to plan a move or compare options, three practical filters help narrow the field. First, layer cost rankings against quality rankings, a high-cost state with poor average quality offers worse value than a moderate-cost state with strong ratings. Second, weigh proximity to existing family support against absolute cost differences; a $1,000-per-month savings in a state 1,500 miles from primary caregivers may not deliver net benefit once travel and emotional costs are counted. Third, confirm the Medicaid waiver landscape in any state under serious consideration; eligibility rules, asset-protection options, and the wait list for home and community-based services (HCBS) waivers vary dramatically and often determine what a family will actually pay out of pocket after public-program coverage.
The bar under each facilities shows that state's share of the Texas leader value, so you can scan relative magnitude at a glance.
| # | State | Facilities |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas TX | 1,177 |
| 2 | California CA | 1,162 |
| 3 | Ohio OH | 922 |
| 4 | Florida FL | 694 |
| 5 | Illinois IL | 669 |
| 6 | Pennsylvania PA | 658 |
| 7 | New York NY | 596 |
| 8 | Indiana IN | 507 |
| 9 | Missouri MO | 487 |
| 10 | Michigan MI | 423 |
| 11 | North Carolina NC | 419 |
| 12 | Iowa IA | 391 |
| 13 | Georgia GA | 356 |
| 14 | New Jersey NJ | 348 |
| 15 | Massachusetts MA | 341 |
| 16 | Minnesota MN | 339 |
| 17 | Wisconsin WI | 323 |
| 18 | Tennessee TN | 304 |
| 19 | Kansas KS | 297 |
| 20 | Virginia VA | 289 |
| 21 | Oklahoma OK | 284 |
| 22 | Kentucky KY | 269 |
| 23 | Louisiana LA | 266 |
| 24 | Alabama AL | 224 |
| 25 | Arkansas AR | 221 |
| 26 | Maryland MD | 220 |
| 27 | Colorado CO | 210 |
| 28 | Mississippi MS | 202 |
| 29 | Washington WA | 194 |
| 30 | Connecticut CT | 191 |
| 31 | South Carolina SC | 187 |
| 32 | Nebraska NE | 179 |
| 33 | Arizona AZ | 140 |
| 34 | Oregon OR | 128 |
| 35 | West Virginia WV | 123 |
| 36 | South Dakota SD | 97 |
| 37 | Utah UT | 97 |
| 38 | Idaho ID | 80 |
| 39 | Maine ME | 78 |
| 40 | New Hampshire NH | 74 |
| 41 | North Dakota ND | 73 |
| 42 | Rhode Island RI | 73 |
| 43 | New Mexico NM | 68 |
| 44 | Nevada NV | 66 |
| 45 | Montana MT | 61 |
| 46 | Delaware DE | 44 |
| 47 | Hawaii HI | 42 |
| 48 | Wyoming WY | 36 |
| 49 | Vermont VT | 34 |
| 50 | Alaska AK | 20 |
| 51 | District of Columbia DC | 17 |
Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare.
What do families ask most?
Does more nursing homes mean better access to care?
Not always. Total facility count must be considered relative to the state's elderly population. A state with many nursing homes but an even larger senior population may still face bed shortages. Conversely, a smaller state with fewer facilities but a smaller elderly population may offer better per-capita access.
Are nursing home numbers increasing or decreasing?
The total number of nursing homes in the U.S. has been slowly declining as more seniors opt for home health care, assisted living, and community-based services. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated facility closures, particularly among smaller, rural nursing homes. However, demand remains strong in areas with rapidly aging populations.
Explore More Rankings
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.